The increase in food production owes much to fertilizers and better machinery, but some people think that it has a negative impact on human health and community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the past few decades, the world has seen an upsurge in the trend of people being overdependent on fertilizers and machinery in producing various types of food. It seems to me that this growing tendency carries a certain degree of risk to the local community.
To begin with, the overuse of inorganic fertilizers may release relatively high proportion of pollutants. To hit this one the head, water ways, which are close to farms using fertilizers, are possibly polluted by a range of detrimental effects of toxic emissions. The health of local residents would be greatly aggravated since they have to utilize these sources of contaminated water on a daily basis. In addition, it is perhaps even more significant if a farmer uses synthetic fertilizers in a long period of time, which may result in soil erosion.
On top of that, excessive use of machinery emits a considerable amount of carbon dioxide. Carbon emissions play a leading role in air contamination as well as lead to multiple respiratory-relating diseases. Furthermore, as loads of companies tend to replace employees with better machinery, it would pose a threat with respect to job market, which has already been severely competitive. All in all, it can be concluded that there is a possible connection between this tendency and the potential dangers to the public.
On the whole, owing to the reasons mentioned above, it is my personal belief that the rise in using fertilizers and machines in food production has ample adverse impacts when it comes to human health as well as job opportunities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...er uses synthetic fertilizers in a long period of time, which may result in soil erosion. O...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, well, in addition, as well as, on the whole, to begin with, with respect to, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07307692308 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05775520013 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646153846154 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8621211826 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.909090909 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129204808598 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392933039128 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510919503401 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839159709903 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606053770751 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.