The increase in the number of privately-owned cars is having a negative impact on both our towns and the environment. What can individuals and the government do to reduce this problem?
It is undeniable that people’s current living standard has been improving significantly in light of economic progression, which contributes to the soaring number of private cars. From my perspective, the sharp increase in the number of cars owned by people has several grave consequences on the environment and cities that demand both national authorities and citizens to take actions to address the problems.
To begin with, the sharp increase in car ownership proportion is triggering air pollution and traffic congestion in metropolitan areas. With respect to traffic jam, a dramatic rise in the number of private cars is likely to exert severe pressure on the transport system at the grid-locked hours traffic. Take Bangkok as a prime example, car owners usually have to queue up for hours due to the excessive number of cars on roads. In terms of air quality, carbon dioxide emission from cars is one of the dominant contributors to global warming. For example, Indonesia recently has had to move its capital to another city to ease the burden for the transportation system caused by rising individual cars.
Besides, a variety of ultimate solutions have been proposed to minimize the detrimental impacts of excessive car ownership rate on the environment and urban areas. The initial solution is to encourage individuals to oft to electric cars or public transports. For instance, Netherland is renowned for cycling to work resulting in the plummeting private cars. As a result, people’s physical health has been protected from respiratory diseases. Additionally, increasing taxes on imported cars should be taken into serious account to confront bottlenecks caused by cars. By doing this, people will tend to avoid purchasing new cars due to the fact that individuals are required to cost a fortune to buy a brand-new car.
In conclusion, increasing private cars might mirror the economic growth of a country, however, it might also bring about several unanticipated problems that require both the government and citizens to collaborate to solve.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32721712538 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97931218522 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577981651376 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9055084233 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269572644876 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807911376409 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494635971923 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155837478503 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019711085057 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.