With the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers, fewer people are writing letters Some people think that the traditional skill of writing letters will disappear completely To what extent do you agree or disagree
In today's world, with the growth of electronic devices like smartphones and computer usage, many people struggle to avoid writing letters. Some of them argue that the conventional technique of handwriting will vanish in the near future. Personally, although typing on online platforms is beneficial in some circumstances, I believe that writing is not completely eradicated.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why writing letters is less frequent in the era of modern technology. To begin with, it is undeniable that a huge number of individuals are leaning towards using smartphones or computers due to the convenience of these devices. In fact, the methods of communication have become more informal than in the past, and thus, citizens are more likely to send letters on online platforms than write and send them to the post office. By contrast, writing letters takes a lot of time to write, and it takes lots of hours for recipients to receive messages. Especially when citizens must give the necessary details immediately, traditional transmitting letters are unable to meet this standard. Additionally, the sender has to pay a bonus service fee. On the contrary, sending online mail-in several applications like G-mail is free.
However, I think that writing letters still plays an indispensable role in the community because of a plethora of perks that cannot be completely eliminated. First, handwritten letters are used in many government offices around the world because of their safety for both senders and receivers, associated with protecting top-secret information which might easily be stolen by third parties. Furthermore, writing letters to friends and family members can depict a gesture of love from the writer's emotions, and this can not be replaced by text messages and images. For instance, on a person's birthday, writing letters make him or her happier rather than sending a text. Finally, it is true that not all citizens in the world have their own computers or smartphones to connect to the Internet. As a result, the only possible measure is to write letters in a traditional way.
In conclusion, despite the fact that modern devices will continue to be the main means of communication because of their convenience and efficiency, I conclude that traditional skills for writing letters are still vital as they are preferable on some occasions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at writing is not completely eradicated. On the one hand, there are a variety of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...messages and images. For instance, on a persons birthday, writing letters make him or h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 852, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ly possible measure is to write letters in a traditional way. In conclusion, despite the fact tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, so, still, third, thus, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, it is true, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26109660574 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01942392395 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563968668407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0038100757 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.9375 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9375 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6875 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31906448916 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954980642331 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573613519963 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18947514102 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205230429513 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.