Increasing car usage in many large global cities has caused a number of problems. Some cities have proposed banning private vehicles from the city centre. To what extent do you agree with this method?.
Nowadays, as the global population has increased, so has the number of cars on our roads. Some large urban areas have suggested prohibiting private vehicles. In my opinion, I agree with this aforementioned statement, and this essay will discuss that why banning cars is entirely justified.
Some cities have belief of banning private cars would help eliminate the problems that these vehicles are causing. One of the outcomes of this method is to reduce traffic, which makes one's destination faster to arrive. The reason behind this is that the fewer motor cars are on our road, the less time it takes to get to any place. For example, if getting to work takes an hour for someone during the traffic peaks, using an alternative transport will help them to arrive half an hour before. Consequently, reducing car usage has a considerable influence on traffics.
Moreover, another result of forbidding vehicles I would consider is to minimize pollution and provide a clean environment. This is because carbon dioxide gas emitted from automobile exhaust is one of the leading causes of metropolis city pollution. For example, recent research in my country, Iraq, suggests that 75% of air pollution is caused by the increasing numbers of vehicles on the streets. Therefore, limiting pollution not only requires knowing the reasons but to do in action, so it is essential to decrease the number of vehicles to get a clean environment.
In conclusion, car usage has become a controversial issue in many urban cities. For that reason, some cities are considering ban vehicles as a solution. This essay argued why prohibiting those vehicles is an absolute imperative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ethod is to reduce traffic, which makes ones destination faster to arrive. The reaso...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13970588235 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84519871175 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599264705882 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2837420384 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346611870727 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106382867028 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789041882092 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197402046226 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280710977698 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.