Nowadays, it’s true that a massive number of people tend to work for different companies and to play various professional roles. I know why the case is like this and I believe the trend could bring more positive effects to individual’s development.
There are several reasons why people, especially the younger ones, choose to change workplaces more frequently previous to the old times. The major one is that more and more new business models and the cutting-edge technologies are coming about into our societies. Therefore, people have a variety of options and are more likely to attempt those that they assume themselves prefer to. For example, including Google, increasing number of high-tech companies are dedicated in the research of diver-less cars, which could be hardly imagined dating back to last century. Furthermore, our societies are becoming more open due to social and cultural development, so that people can choose the professions incline to their interests or ambitions.
Some people may concern that being faithful to current job responsibilities can foster their skills of problem-solving and leadership related to future promotion. In addition, sticking to our academic background into work is a favorable extension from studying theories to putting them into practice.
However, in my opinion, the technologies are reshaping our ways of living significantly, and it’s time to re-ponder out perspectives on career evolution. Firstly, bounding to different areas could definitely help to broaden our mind with broad range of knowledge and widen our working experiences. Secondly, we can’t emphasize the importance of the ability of facing challenges and adapting to new environments too much, in order to stand out from other opponents. Thirdly, working with people having discrepancies in skills, knowledge and experiences could be a driven force to encourage ourselves to be an adept at learning new things.
In conclusion, although some people believe that cohering longer and deeper to what are engaging with is more crucial for their career path, I deem that the advantages of shifting amongst more job opportunities outweigh the disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53709198813 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10556772423 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626112759644 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2729926111 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129967274984 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398261733097 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321259181488 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678052157026 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267089762515 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.