With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will became a thing of the past. To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will became a thing of the past. To what extent do you agree?

More and more people are using tools to communicate such as the Internet and mobile phones fo sending messages, some people thought that communicating face to face will be forgotten. Although, I belive that there is a great change of how people interact today, I disagree that personal interaction will be practice less in the future.

It is true that with the development if technology, it is easier to connect now than ever in any part of the world. The Internet brought individuals together beyond race, nationality and religion with the help of different applications downloadable online. For instance, Google hangouts, enables users to reach their families and friends abroad by simply connecting to their Wi-fi or mobile data services. In doing this, they can see the face ans speak reel-time to the person on the other line. In addition to that, the invention of mobile phones make it accessible to individuals to spread information to multiple recipients all at once.

However, although the Internet has a huge impact in how people communicate today, I disagree that speaking face to face will any less valuable. Firstly, humans are social beings. This means that personal interaction with family and friends is part of daily lives. If someone is in romantic relationship, for example, it will be difficult to know each other without seeing face to face. Secondly, the joy of person-to-person level of interaction is immeasurable, this is because people are able to see facial expressions, body gestures and unique mannerism of individuals around them. Lastly, in the local community level, trust and understanding in the neighborhood will be established by constant interactions and meetings in social gatherings.

In conclusion, although the use of internet and handheld devices is becoming increasingly popular, the face to face communication will still be valuable on the days to come. Human beings are perfectly designed to communicate in physical, emotional and social levels

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and religion with the help of different applications downloadable online. For in...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28616352201 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01952462721 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578616352201 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6587192421 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.066666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249105288131 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081560987688 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884850928451 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166682786925 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543517270007 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.