Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree. What are other measures do you think might be effective?
Traffic congestion and pollution has become a pressing issue recently. Some people believe that this problem can be addressed by increasing the petrol’s price, whilst some others do not support this idea. I can see the issue from both perspectives, however I consider the latter to be more convincing and I think there are better solutions to this problem.
Those who argue that the best way to control traffic volume and pollution is increasing the price of fuel assert that, once higher rate is imposed, people may use the public transport instead of their own cars. This measure will limit private cars and results in reducing air pollution.
There may be some truth to the above argument; however there are facts under which this measure will not work effectively. For example, daily commuting is compulsory to most of people. Even the price of fuel is higher, people have to accept to pay for it. In addition, the transport companies will not stop running their services just because of increase in fuel price. In this case, they will apply a higher fare to passengers.
Furthermore, growing traffic and pollution come from many other factors such as growing population and no control of vehicles. Therefore, the government should consider other solutions than lifting up the price of fuel and work out a strategic plan to solve this problem. One of these measures can be developing an overall public transport network which includes different transport modes, for example, bus system, elevated railway and tram. This network targets at competitive price, convenience and safety to encourage commuter to use. Besides, it is important to launch programs to raise public awareness of protecting environment and effects caused by pollution.
To conclude, I believe these measures I just mention above will be more effective than increasing the price of gasoline in order to solve the traffic and pollution problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ample, daily commuting is compulsory to most of people. Even the price of fuel is higher, peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18530351438 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66493511476 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565495207668 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4264824157 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215133828215 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648851235267 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053939617108 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130034437544 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447609184617 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.