Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
As one of a developing country, we have been through the same issues such as transport congestion and atmospheric pollution over the past couple of years. People do a vehicle purchasing rapidly especially in central city. The use of public transportation and personal car keep ascending unnoticable. This situation create the other following problem. In this essay, I strongly agree that change the price of petrol has unsignificant effect with traffic and pollution.
Today, every families from different social classes could buy motorcycle and car due to the credit facility that are given by some companies. Everyone can loosely get fuel for their vehicles which is mean if government specify to lift the price up, it will not bear citizens to stop using it on daily life. Besides that, factory activities are caused air pollution as well. We could not sum up and curtail if price of petron is the only light solution to this because pollution does come from many resources. For example, fishing by boat, cigarretes, restorant's kitchen, or factory activities. It is clear that even thought government installs a rule about it, there could not stick for a long time pleasant of way.
On the contrary, increasing the price of fuel will determine people who come from either mid class of society or even poorer. They are perhaps considering about all the cost that idea could drive especially city office workers to start using public transportation service more often because as we know, in this era, people refer to personal car for work-home purpose. In exact case, big city has trains or buses as transport in public area. So, this thing arouses citizen's awareness afterward in periodic of time.
In conclusion, I am in the believe of the rise of fuel's price does not have reliable influence to the country
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-04-13 | monmon12345 | 89 | view |
2021-07-25 | tanmeet | 56 | view |
2020-09-17 | Maryam42 | 84 | view |
2020-09-17 | rini pratiwi | 56 | view |
2020-09-17 | rini pratiwi | 56 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 84
- Nowadays older people who need employment have to compete with the young people What problems does this cause and what are the solutions 67
- Some people believe that children leisure activities must be educational otherwise they are complete waste of time Do you agree or disagree 82
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society How can this problem be solved 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'creates'.
Suggestion: creates
...p ascending unnoticable. This situation create the other following problem. In this es...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...odic of time. In conclusion, I am in the believe of the rise of fuels price does not hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
... of time. In conclusion, I am in the believe of the rise of fuels price does not hav...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00660066007 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66233350523 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640264026403 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4302118907 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8125 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114436510952 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361139010493 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479877600551 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666032660226 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464497252754 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.