It is very unfortunate that traffic and pollution are readily increasing but by raising the price of petrol is the best measure to solve this problem. I do not agree with they give with this statement
Firstly, from the last years the price of petrol is increasing day by day, but despite of being decrease in the number of vehicles, there is a continuous increase in vehicles on the road. So, this method is not effective in controlling the traffic and pollution. Secondary, in developing countries only rich people can afford vehicles and high price of petrol will not affect them thus, this method will not affect this burning problem.
To solve this problem, there are several measures which can be implied. Foremost and the long term effective, measures to control traffic is to encourage people to use public transport for travelling as pollution and traffic mostly rise due to the large number of private vehicles and this method will reduce the number of vehicles. Thereby, this result in in lowering of traffic. Besides this, problem can be solved by motivating people to use bicycles and footpath for walking instead of cars for short distance. At the end, we can drop this problem by not providing sufficient parking facilities as if people do not have area for parking they will not considered to use vehicles. So these measures will help to eliminate pollution and traffic.
All in all, this problem can be solved by only implications of strict rules and also by awaring people, not by making the proce of petrol high.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 354, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...umber of vehicles. Thereby, this result in in lowering of traffic. Besides this, pro...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in in lowering of traffic. Besides this, problem can be solved by motivating peop...
^^
Line 4, column 656, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'consider'
Suggestion: consider
...not have area for parking they will not considered to use vehicles. So these measures will...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87404580153 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53068402491 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526717557252 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4392288418 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.090909091 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225926468587 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10327624795 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622856956085 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167695345493 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101956950925 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.