Inflating the price of petrol is often thought to be the finest way to solve increasing traffic and pollution issues. However, i am completely against the given idea. This essay will discuss firstly why hiking the cost of petrol is not the ideal step and secondly, the productive measures which have to be implemented by the authority with relevant examples.
The vast majority of vehicles that run on roads actually constitute cars as opposed to buses, motorcycles and trucks. Ironically, these cars are predominantly owned by affluent people. So there is a high possibility that prosperous drivers will not be alarmed at all by such policy because they can even shift to more expensive cars which are favourable to the atmosphere. To add to this, while cars are flexible, convenient and efficient, other modes of transportation are widely considered to be irregular, pricey and perilous. Next, apart from privileged drivers, there are also taxi drivers, who are not well-off. But these impoverished drivers tend to put up high fares in order to counterbalance the surged fee of petrol, leading to a complete failure.
Firstly, the government ought to embolden people to share their vehicles especially cars. As this type of scheme is a good antidote to reduce pollution by bringing down thousands of cars plying on the road, it also decongests the road. For illustration, cars sharing can eradicate 11 cars from the streets and reduce greenhouse gases by around 13 metric tons according to the report in India. Secondly, if the regime subsidised the public transportation, which generally uses less fuel and is environmentally friendly, slashed the fares and ensured security, people would be unquestionably tempted to choose mass transport over cars. In addition, people will be demoralised to drive old vehicles, which are truly liable for the heavy congestion and pollution, provided that the ministry enacts tough laws against them.
In conclusion, with the consideration of an enormous amount of cars, presumably, the strategy of increasing the price of petrol is fruitless in addressing traffic jams and pollution headaches.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
before 'Firstly, the government ought to...' in the third paragraph, there should be one transition sentence, like:
'A lot of measures can be used to deal with above issues. Firstly, the government ought to...'
to keep it smoothly.
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 341 350
No. of Characters: 1749 1500
No. of Different Words: 211 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.297 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.129 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.884 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.733 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.274 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.31 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.516 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... traffic and pollution issues. However, i am completely against the given idea. T...
^
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to mass'
Suggestion: to mass
...uld be unquestionably tempted to choose mass transport over cars. In addition, peopl...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raffic jams and pollution headaches.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, apart from, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30498533724 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9834872616 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627565982405 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8844870843 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118255108768 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393944990966 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665232531828 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896500314424 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619699716277 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.