Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Over the last decade, the matters arising from transportation and pollution caused by it has never ceased to draw public attention and provoke debates. Although it is strongly considered by some that the measures with the aim of limiting people from using private vehicles demonstrated its effective impact, the issue as to whether raising the price of fossil fuels used for cars and other individual means is the most effective key on solving the matters as mentioned above remains controversial. To the best of my knowledge, I’m of the opinion that this is an immensely debatable question to be analyzed in light of several aspects before concluding that cost of petrol can not be the main culprit which we should focus on when finding solutions for recently increasing traffic and pollution issues.
Firstly, in terms of some typical tasks related to transport including traffic congestion, traffic collisions and injuries, it is clearly proved that most of the cases occur under the lack of human awareness of safely driving or the poor infrastructure, so in the latest period, governments are concentrating on upgrading their transport infrastructure and enhancing people’s mindset on transportation as well as building controlling system and rigorous regulations to people using transport vehicles instead of forbidding individual vehicles or raising the price of petrol to limit them using the individual ones.
Secondly, it is equally important to recognize that in order to reduce polluted air impacted by the emission of fossil fuels, the authorities should launch official policies to partly limit using private vehicles, particularly, in metropolitan areas, and to encourage engaging in current public means gradually and not raising the price of petrol to an unaffordable level which can change their habit on using private cars or motorbikes instead as some may be ignorant of the fact that our current public transportation grids have not been upgraded enough in some suburban areas. Moreover, we should be awake to the influence of excessively increasing the price of any kind of raw materials such as petrol, which can severely impact the whole social economy as inflation can happen. And, last but not least, when comparing the cost paid for buying a vehicle and petroleum for using it, it can be seen that people easily spend budget on fuels after they bought vehicles. So, why don’t we pay attention to the price of vehicles, not that of fuels?
In conclusion, under no circumstances, does the method of raising the price of gasoline play the most vital role in solving issues related to traffic and pollution as not only we should not ignore the arising consequences impacted by the above method such as the lack of upgraded public transportation network, risk of the economic inflation, but also it is proven that raising human-being awareness on travelling, driving is more essential measure to answer the matters as given in this topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...strated its effective impact, the issue as to whether raising the price of fossil fuels used ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, as to, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2499.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 479.0 315.596192385 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21711899791 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88075094969 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521920668058 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 778.5 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 20.2975951904 261% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 183.995169019 49.4020404114 372% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 277.666666667 106.682146367 260% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.2222222222 20.7667163134 256% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129225478035 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578789467925 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323783214642 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844770641635 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037777153314 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.8 13.0946893788 228% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 50.2224549098 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 11.3001002004 212% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.1190380762 229% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 10.7795591182 223% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.