The three pit charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The three pit charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Given are the charts depicting yearly expenditure of a UK education institute in three different years over 20-year timeline.
From an overall perspective, paying salary for teachers and workers dominated in total cost whereas the outgoings of insurance is the least amount from 1981 to 2001.
As is visible in the illustration, salary payment for teachers consituted the highest proportion with the rate of 40% in 1981, slightly rose to 50% in 1991 before there was a small decrease of 5% to 45% at the end of the period. Following this element was worker’s wages with a downtrend from 28% in the beginning to 15% in 2001.
In contrast, expense of insurance item witnessed a considerable increase from only 2% in 1981 to 3% in 1991 before up to 8% in the end.
Furthermore, there was a fluctuation without a specific trend in terms of outlays on resources as books and furniture and equipment. While cost for resources stood at 15% in 1981, which was followed by a 5-percent raise to 20% at the middle of period before plummeting roughly double to 9% in 2001, furniture and equipment saw a sharp slump from 15% to 5% in the first 10-year period from 1981, then significantly soaring to take the second highest percentage of 23% in total spending in 2001.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the charts depicting yearly expenditure...
^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cost for resources stood at 15% in 1981, which was followed by a 5-percent raise ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77168949772 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81188089591 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584474885845 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.4158503022 43.030603864 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.285714286 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102955092829 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460684414315 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238282094443 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580659292472 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00934803563305 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the charts depicting yearly expenditure...
^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cost for resources stood at 15% in 1981, which was followed by a 5-percent raise ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77168949772 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81188089591 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584474885845 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.4158503022 43.030603864 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.285714286 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102955092829 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460684414315 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238282094443 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580659292472 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00934803563305 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.