The impact of humans on the environment is a widely debated and contemporary issue. Whilst it is unarguable that large organisations and the government can play the biggest part in improving the situation, it is also possible that individuals can contribute.
Firstly, corporate businesses can pioneer positive change. With tremendous numbers of employees and excruciating amounts of waste, they have a significant impact on the planet. If, for instance, recycling bins were provided, and reusable drinking containers encouraged, there would be a substantial improvement in the reduction of and reuse of waste.
In addition, governments tend to have an extraordinary influence on the country, as a whole. They could introduce environmental initiatives through the media or make changes through legislation. During the governmental smoking campaign, laws were introduced about where people were permitted to smoke, paired with advertisements on the health issues caused by it. This led to a tremendous reduction in smoking. Therefore, this might be the most effective way of environmental improvement.
Although governments are best placed to initiate change, it should also be the responsibility of the individual. The impact of house hold waste on the environment must not be ignored. A recent BBC documentary explored the large quantity of single use wipes that were used by one small town. These are constituted of 90% plastic which is bad for the planet as it takes years to degrade.
In conclusion, caring for the environment should be the priority of both large businesses and the government. I believe that these areas are where the most vast improvements can be made, however individuals must also play their part. If everyone could take steps to save the planet it might be preserved for years to come.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, it is also possible that individuals can contribute. Firstly, corporate bu...
^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us numbers of employees and excruciating amounts of waste, they have a significan...
^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aordinary influence on the country, as a whole. They could introduce environmenta...
^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould introduce environmental initiatives through the media or make changes throug...
^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hrough the media or make changes through legislation. During the governmental sm...
^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gh legislation. During the governmental smoking campaign, laws were introduced ...
^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lation. During the governmental smoking campaign, laws were introduced about whe...
^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsibility of the individual. The impact of house hold waste on the environment ...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bility of the individual. The impact of house hold waste on the environment must...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37762237762 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15586123274 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601398601399 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7021114202 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4705882353 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140411348918 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413435765245 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608814438577 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854921803557 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607458096862 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.