Inspite of advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
The revolutionary development of technology in the field of agriculture has multiplied its production by many folds. Although technology had reached zenith in case of agriculture but there are some people around the globe who are still starving. The following essay will state the causes and provide solutions to the given problem.
There are many reasons for people not receiving proper nutritious and healthy food. Firstly, the government is unable to provide basic necessities to its people due to corruption, not having enough funds or lack of responsibility. Secondly, improper distribution of food among the citizens of the nation as well as hoarding of goods by the rich people. Wastage of food in homes and restaurant is rising and this also accounts for the reason.
In order to prevent starving of people around the world, the government should promote awareness programs in order to awareness among its citizens. This kind of programs or organizations will help the common man to understand the importance of food and prevent its wastage. This can also be done by placing posters on the walls of the restaurants and streets. Donations in the form of charity will also reduce the number of people who are facing this problem. The government should ban the hoarding of goods and should try to keep track on it by raiding potential hoarding sites. Ruling authorities should place their differences aside and fight together to overcome this problem.
In conclusion, the problem of starvation can be eradicated by implementing the proposed solution as stated above. This problem is being faced by most of the underdeveloped nations, therefore, the developed nations should help the needy people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ly, the government is unable to provide basic necessities to its people due to corruption, not ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22181818182 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87197688704 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549090909091 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.7025494941 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247650609687 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791440356437 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541841919588 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137776930842 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452783548718 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.