Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History
The given statement implies that some people believe that History is more important than Science and Technology as a subject in school. Personally, I think Science and Technology are more important than History. Because the future depends on the knowledge of science.
As in the case of History as a subject, it teaches us how and from where we came. It shows us who we are and how we use to live. Although learning History is also important but not as much as a science. History teaches us what we used to live and what we usually wear. Though history teaches us many things we should look ahead in time. History does not tell us what will be there in the future but technology does that. We can't change the past but we change to make the future better, hence science and technology should be in top priority.
Science and Technology makes the human task easier and help us to sustain life now and in the future. If we encourage our children to spend their energy in thinking about latest development then they will surely find a better solution to modern problems. Minds of young people are very sharp and have the capacity to produce a better result. But as children gradually learn if we expose them to science early they will be in a better place to solve and develop the technology.
In conclusion, I would give the highest priority and importance to Science and Technology as compared to History. As both subjects are important but attention must give to science. Because science is the future and if the future is safe then the coming generation will also be safe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nology are more important than History. Because the future depends on the knowledge of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...came. It shows us who we are and how we use to live. Although learning History is ...
^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... used to live and what we usually wear. Though history teaches us many things we shoul...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...the future but technology does that. We cant change the past but we change to make t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to sustain life now and in the future. If we encourage our children to spend thei...
^^
Line 6, column 166, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'about the latest'.
Suggestion: about the latest
...ldren to spend their energy in thinking about latest development then they will surely find ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, then, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64412811388 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44666515648 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498220640569 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7003489313 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7647058824 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269913262211 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103391308981 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119920892231 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198116649286 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152885700872 0.056905535591 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.