It is generally said that intelligence is one of the significant aspects of leadership. I fully consent to this viewpoint as understanding seems to have more benefits for administration in certain ways than other components.
To initiate the benefits of acumen in terms of management. The first and foremost advantage is to make good decisions. To explain, if the team leader takes appropriate verdicts for starting new projects or schemes, which are not only good for the company but also staff members, the revenue of the organization, as well as the income of employees increases a lot, while it is not possible without having the intelligence of the ruler. For instance, a person, who is working as a manager in an IT company, can increase productivity while launching innovative projects in the market that is only possible due to intelligence, whereas it cannot be with other ways.
To commence with, correct observation for finding mistakes is also associated with intelligence while working as the head. To elaborate, when the team head observes the employees during work time, they can find out the genuine mistakes which are done by them. As a result, the workers can solve the errors for the progression of the company that leads to success amongst them as well as the organization also; however, it is impossible without accurate observation by the team leader. For example, a person who is working as a duty or general manager in the hotel can teach the employees how to overcome the mistakes in works whilst observing them.
In conclusion, I believe that intelligence seems to be more beneficial for the leader because it helps a leader to take adequate decisions, as well as correct mistakes of employees in the works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 482, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...a person who is working as a manager in an IT company can increase productivity while...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 488, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...on who is working as a manager in an IT company can increase productivity while launchi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce whereas it cannot be with other ways To commence with correct observation for...
^^^
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mistakes in works whilst observing them In conclusion I believe that intelligenc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89655172414 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87978728241 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489655172414 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 290.0 20.2975951904 1429% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1420.0 106.682146367 1331% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 290.0 20.7667163134 1396% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 122.0 7.06120827912 1728% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0814927249613 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814927249613 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576823004278 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172663860469 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 146.6 13.0946893788 1120% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -222.87 50.2224549098 -444% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 116.4 11.3001002004 1030% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.62 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.07 8.58950901804 245% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 118.0 10.1190380762 1166% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.