intelligent students should be taught separately from other students To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believed that talents should not learn with ordinary students. I agree that geniuses need customized learning plans to fully develop their intellectual endowment, but I do not think they should stay away from the majority.
Special care is essential for fulfilling the potential of intelligent students. They are usually fast learners with deep thought and demonstrate outstanding levels of aptitude or competence in one or more domains, which means standard teaching model would not suit them. Instead, personalized flexible curricula, including supplementary high-level materials and project-oriented teaching styles, should be employed. Besides, talent development programs after school can also be a plus point. Jeff Bezos, for example, the founder of Amazon, was invited to a science program at the University of California, which improved his computer skills and prepared the ground for his career.
While an individualized teaching plan is necessary, separating talents from other students might cost their social development. Due to different mindsets and concerns, most intelligent students suffered from lacking proper social skills. Separation would only deteriorate the situation. There is a study on the graduates from a famous school for talented in China named the University of Science and Technology of China. It suggests that those talents tend to end up to be being specialists rather than CEOs or managers. From the perspective of personal achievement and influence, they have not shown superior accomplishments than other students with a similar intellectual gift but had chosen traditional education.
In conclusion, the development of talents should not come at the cost of social skills. A customized learning plan adding to traditional classes would be better than being separated from the majority.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 111, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to plan'
Suggestion: to plan
...of social skills. A customized learning plan adding to traditional classes would be ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73454545455 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05756128176 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8411517346 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243285634852 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752902097893 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554192405665 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140103189154 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689469183176 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.