International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Recently, there has been a boom in the tourism industry, especially the international sector. However, with the invasion of foreign tourists, people believe that they have brought plenty of negative problems to the indigenous society, such as exerting dire consequences of natural habitats and local culture. In my opinion, the advantages of a well-developed tourism industry would outweigh the severe disadvantages.
To begin with, tourism disrupts the ecosystems of tourist attractions. In this regard, researchers have reported that mountains of plastic waste have been measured wherever there is a sightseeing site, hence causing permanent damage to this particular landscape. Mount Everest would be a striking example, where has been acknowledged that thousands of waste have been identified in the last few years and the number has kept increasing. Furthermore, the decline of ecosystems would also affect the habitats of the local wildlife due to the action of littering that tourists could have done. Despite that, these actions could be prevented when the local governments enact legislation to heighten awareness among travelers.
However, everyone is enormously benefited from the burgeoning travel industry. The first and foremost impact that the industry has brought to society is a higher number of job opportunities. From this perspective, local residents can open small businesses that sell local souvenirs as well as the expansion of indigenous restaurants and services. This practice would provide a higher influx of money for the authority to allocate into the facility and infrastructural development of that society, as well as enhancing other aspects within the country such as education and healthcare. Therefore, countries with a well-developed tourism industry would uplift their socio-economic status through their flourishing hospitality sector.
To sum up, the enormous benefits of international tourism trumps its negative impact. The major advantage of all is to have more job opportunities and better growth of a nation. The governments should encourage travel agencies to open more eco-friendly tours and establish some environmental remodeling to protect not only the natural habitats but also the local inhabitants.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72537313433 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13351233158 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4095337585 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.875 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181077647205 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678429138665 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081172799149 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120310409054 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602482858167 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.