International travel is becoming cheaper, and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent times, traveling has gained exponential ubiquity among nations. With the help of reforms and open-door policies, as well as being reasonably priced, tourisms of several countries have witnessed numerous people traveling each year. Notwithstanding some prospective problems lurking beneath this notion, I am in favor of the viewpoint that the benefits of international tourism outweigh the drawbacks it brings. In this essay, both facets of this matter will be elucidated before drawing any further conclusions.
On the one hand, domestic travel could lead to the increasing cost of living in host countries. Courtesy of an engaging number of tourists flooding into the countries for travel purposes, more commodities might be built and more services might be provided to accommodate the constantly evolving needs of tourists. One prominent example of this is that more restaurants, hotels, and clothing shops have been constructed in tourism-centric areas, which potentially be a major contribution to the rising cost of food and clothes of the locals. As a result, residents living in those travel-oriented areas may have to face up with financial burden if they are unable to pay for the stratospherically high prices of products.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that tourism may cultivate the overall economy of countries. By virtue of international traveling, there might be a prospective rising number of job opportunities and career prospects. As formerly mentioned, the rise in prevalence of traveling is synonymous with the increase in the number of dining properties, thus, employees would make a profit out of the needs for serving tourists and customers. Moreover, by looking from a broader viewpoint, it is clear that this could bolster the relationships between countries. For example, there might be more collaborations to cultivate tourism industries, hence the possibilities of prosperous financial situations of those nations.
In conclusion, although domestic traveling can partly contribute to the rising living costs of citizens, all in all, its advantages have eclipsed the possible downsides with being beneficial to the economy and to the relationships of different nations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5604719764 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2198798823 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581120943953 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9192356919 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.642857143 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215459447244 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659603822644 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479367872874 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118690820206 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457890884589 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.