Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Is this a negative or positive development?
In recent times, society has witnessed an exponential increase in the advancements of technology. To facilitate the needs of humans, several robots have been created to achieve this goal with numerous household chores finished or tasks done at dangerous workplaces. Notwithstanding the possibility of several problems lurking beneath this notion, robot task performance seems to have many advantages which can potentially lead to positive development. In this essay, both negative and positive facets of this will be further elucidated before drawing any conclusion.
To begin with, automatic machines helping with a wide variety of tasks might stem the root of a sedentary lifestyle. As there are now more technological inventions like dishwashers or washing machines, people are likely to find doing the dishes or washing clothes no longer difficult tasks. This could vaguely draw out a future of automation where their daily rituals will prospectively just include eating scrumptious food and trying out different culinary delights while sitting on the sofa watching television. As appealing as it may be, if there is no end to this unhealthy lifestyle, individuals will have to face troubles related to their physical and mental well-being, such as obesity or high blood pressure.
However, turning to the other side of the argument, it is undeniable that robots can do missions in dangerous conditions which are impossible for humans. As of today’s world, people have already seen or read in newspapers about automatic machines working in extreme weather conditions or places that have been affected by radiation. Humans are mortal, therefore when put in high-risk places like construction sites or volcanic areas, unpredictable predicaments may happen; this may be when robots come into place to mitigate the chance of fatality. Another major reason worth mentioning is the increase in productivity. At the workplace or home, with back-ups from robotic assistants, people can focus on tasks on their priority list to achieve better results like increasing work performance or quickening the task accomplishment.
In conclusion, robots may be unbeneficial to some certain extends, however, by looking from a broader viewpoint and shedding light on the aforementioned examples, it is crystal clear that robots can do wonders for people‘s life. Therefore, robots' advancement is of high potential and may bring humanity closer to a better future of automation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52105263158 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0344102276 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628947368421 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6504082431 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.866666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285026830161 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791339483021 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724964599369 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157660052443 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808070098611 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.