It is argued that the internet advancements have facilitated young residents and workers to reach their goals more easily. I totally agree with this notion as such improvements allow students to accomplish their assignments effectively, and workers to communicate more conveniently.
Firstly and foremost, the proliferation of the internet allows students to carry out their assignments more effectively. These days, the proliferation of the internet enables learners to obtain the vast amount of information available in minutes. In the past, conversely, students had to spend much time traveling to libraries and bookshops to check written documentation relevant to their studies. For example, with just typing some specialized keywords related to their studies on the internet, college students have found a huge amount of information relevant to their needs. Consequently, this leads to them saving precious time which can be devoted to other important aspects of their studies.
Furthermore, such improvements of the internet have improved communication at the workplace. In reality, the internet allows office workers to communicate with their clients and colleagues via email in a matter of minutes, whereas it took much longer to conduct such communication in the past with the usage of letters and telephones. If there is an urgent meeting with important foreign partners or clients, workers can organize an online meeting through various video conferencing applications such as Zoom or Microsoft, which allows users to hold video calls or even write virtual messages to each other. As a result, this enables them to enhance greater expediency in conducting communication.
In conclusion, the internet has made it easier for students and workers to achieve their goals in terms of education and communication at the workplace. I am also convinced that young people and laborers should learn how to use the internet and communicate more effectively as the internet will obviously be commonplace and more advanced in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52076677316 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10119157327 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549520766773 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9666636255 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.923076923 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211013934349 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837636495143 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704619838192 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157265823485 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810971246409 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.