The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialise. To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
As human beings are living in an era of technology, the Internet has increased its penetration of almost every household across the globe. While it is widely believed that this invention helps users in connecting with their relatives and friends despite distance and cost, it also keeps them separate from the real world and become less socialised. Personally, I would incline towards the former view due to the internet’s vast contribution to our global connections.
On the one hand, there are several existing internet-related problems that deter some individuals from public interactions and social programmes. In fact, many people prefer chatting with their friends and loved ones via video calls or chat apps at home to meeting them directly due to its convenience and cheapness. Besides, the popularity of the internet also facilitates the widespread use of video games, encouraging a large number of players, especially young ones, to become more addicted to this pastime and solely glue their eyes into the computer screens in lieu of real social interactions.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that the internet plays a crucial role in keeping people in touch with others. In the past when there was no internet connection, people had to use mails via the post office, which took them days or even months to transfer the messages. However, the introduction of the internet and social networking sites, such as Facebook, Twitter or Whats app, has benefited individuals enormously in maintaining contact with each other. Within a click of the mouse, everyone is able to send and receive various messages and emails from almost every corner of the world simultaneously. Clearly, without this technology, international connections between humans would have remained a radical challenge which may adversely affect various aspects of life.
In conclusion, although the use of the internet has both upsides and downsides as being considered above, I would opine that this system has significantly contributed to mankind’s association.
(326 words)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... programmes. In fact, many people prefer chatting with their friends and loved on...
^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at apps at home to meeting them directly due to its convenience and cheapness. Be...
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...espread use of video games, encouraging a large number of players, especially young ones, to beco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns in lieu of real social interactions. On the other hand, it is undeniable that...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ing sites, such as Facebook, Twitter or Whats app, has benefited individuals enormous...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36307692308 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93414261743 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633846153846 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0525410978 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.25 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172583827363 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568255794524 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597365346552 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900688682483 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580774173593 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.