The internet has changed the way we communicate. Much communication today
happens through social media.
communication styles have changed radically over the past 20 years, and this is largely due to the prevalence of social media websites. Some see this as a wonderful enhancement of their lifestyle, while others have a more critical opinion. this essay will outline the benefits and drawbacks of this phenomenon, and will weigh up its merits. social media websites have reached their current level of popularity because of their many advantages. Notably, these websites have made it almost effortless to create and maintain both local and international social networks. In addition, thay allow users to access support when suffering from life’s tribulations and complications. it is possible, as well, to use these sites to find and discuss information about many issues, from the best local shopping to international news. Authorities find social media advantageous when tracking criminals, who sometimes use networks to set up illegal activities. One further advantage is that sites such as LinkedIn are a key resource for job recruiters, and many people find work in this way. However, these sites also have significant negative consequences. Foremost is the fact that both students and workers can waste a great deal of time and productivity because of the distractions these networks provide. this can adversely affect not only academic life but also career opportunities. Another drawback is the amount of misinformation and vicious rumour that can circulate and spread like wildfire, causing real misery and distress to both private citizens and to celebrities. Finally, the websites tend to reduce time spent on face-to-face communication, and, in my opinion, live family and friend interactions are of primary importance for our mental wellbeing. In conclusion, although social media sites have the potential to bring people closer together, they encourage time wasting and superficial communication, and the anonymity that they provide allows for unkind, even nasty, social interactions. people would do better to spend more quality, face-to-face time with real people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Communication
communication styles have changed radically over the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...le others have a more critical opinion. this essay will outline the benefits and dra...
^^^^
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Social
...enomenon, and will weigh up its merits. social media websites have reached their curre...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 681, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...'s tribulations and complications. it is possible, as well, to use these site...
^^
Line 1, column 1302, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...he distractions these networks provide. this can adversely affect not only academic ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 2002, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...nkind, even nasty, social interactions. people would do better to spend more quality, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53918495298 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02625247246 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626959247649 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6195287262 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105302616143 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324280490654 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506554573296 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105302616143 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.