‘The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools.’
How far do you agree with this prediction?
It is anticipated that the conventional reference books are so crucial that they cannot be replaced by the internet. While conceding the effectiveness of the technology, I strongly advocate this prediction.
There is no doubt that the traditional school books are of paramount importance. First and foremost, course books provide the students with accurate fundamental knowledge. Though the Internet also have the knowledge, with thousands of diversified copies, the students may be met up with difficulty of finding the correct information. Secondly, excessive using laptop increases the chance of having sight-related problems. For instance, after the quarantine, more and more students have short-sighted vision due to spending too much time studying by computer. Thirdly, teachers as well as students in third world countries cannot afford the prohibitive quotes of accessing the internet. The examples can be seen in Viet Nam, Laos, Cambodia, especially in mountainous areas.
There is a host of arguments suggested that the internet can be used as replacement for the conventional course books. Firstly, it is strongly believed that the internet has a wide range of materials, which is fiercely useful. However, the information of the internet is not inspected, therefore, there might be false knowledge provided. Secondly, using the internet as a new method of teaching can arouse students’ interest for the lesson. Despite this, the learners are undoubtedly mostly inspired by their instructors, which leads to teaching method being less vital.
In conclusion, my view is that the Internet cannot be used as replacement for the traditional schoolbooks, due to various reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is anticipated that the conventional ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I strongly advocate this prediction. There is no doubt that the traditional s...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...odia, especially in mountainous areas. There is a host of arguments suggested t...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to teaching method being less vital. In conclusion, my view is that the Inter...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58365758755 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10361961147 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603112840467 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.001414096 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191904472452 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666896493576 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535874697775 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12024682354 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111450380674 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.