The invasion of high technology shifts the on-going world trending into a whole new level in every aspects. By looking particularly at the current school curriculum, the inherently system has been changing through the incorporation of both conventional and modern learning method. There are arguments on whether internet sources can outweight the traditional course syllabus or not. I will delve into it in this essay.
First of all, subject syllabus is an enormous treasure with hundreds of book tittle for each topic. By that it takes great effort and a huge amount of time for each learner to make data-gathering, whereas this are solved by searching various websites or look at others' condensed essays and reviews for preferences. Secondly, there are myriad of experiments show a positive method of learning via images, sounds and videos. E-learning can overshadow the traditional method's advantages since the available source are easily accessed. Lastly, rote-learning by reading books can cause further irritation and feeling of downhearted for some students. However, through guided learning, the lessons become lively and colorful, cause no distress or boredom, especially for younger learners and to who prefer a assimilation of both method.
Albeit these advantages are globally approved, some people who opposed to this may argue that internet may have a high chance to distract learners from their lessons because of the acessible to a wide source of entertainment, for example: Facebook, Twitter or online games. Furthermore, students should choose their sources wisely as some of those infomation may not be accredited carefully. This leads to an implicit mistake are not regconised.
In conclusion, the Internet usefulness dominates the conventional learning method in different facets. They outweight their drawbacks and I think it is the best to gradually bring E-learning into the school systems for further and better development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... invasion of high technology shifts the on-going world trending into a whole new level i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
... especially for younger learners and to who prefer a assimilation of both method. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 801, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... for younger learners and to who prefer a assimilation of both method. Albeit ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94899417881 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636666666667 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8741029656 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0845814678203 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336343217631 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377889372047 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504838990671 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240403159559 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.