Criminal conviction is forever a debatable topic which are worthwhile to be taken into account in the most serious way, as for balancing crime rates in any country is a challenging job. There are both valid opinions on whether to apply a fix set of rules and execution regulation depends on criminal types,or the final decision being given out is rely on the circumstances of individuals and the real reason behind it. I will discuss these views on this essay.
On the one hand, since there is an unevitably rising in criminal rates, applying a fixed regulations based on various level of criminal seems to be a more feasible way. People who support this idea rely on the truth that every harmful criminal needs to be punish and punish quickly so as to avoid the resentment that harness in the victims and their families. Furthermore, by using fixed punishments of each crime type, a reduction of time, decisions being made and the delegation of authority is passed down to lower subsidies create a huge benefit for the system as a whole.
On the other hand, people who opposed to the notion of "one size does not fit all" argue that in the background of any stories, it is not simple as it looks. The jury can not have a a good view into every facets of one problem. For example, a father is convicted because of the initial intention to protect his daughter from an invaded burglar. Moreover, giving out the final decision without considering the severity of a case may invoke further social disagreement if one individual is seen as an urbane person but accidentally make one mistake which are unfavourably lethal. It is feasible to mitigate the conviction and to avoid any strife from the society.
These are both reasonable and debatable point of view. However, in my opinion, I think we should consider much more than simply applying and assuming all situations can be handle by a pre-settled system. It is to be seen as a more humanity way of execution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , or
...ion regulation depends on criminal types,or the final decision being given out is r...
^^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
...r the final decision being given out is rely on the circumstances of individuals and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'regulation'?
Suggestion: regulation
...ing in criminal rates, applying a fixed regulations based on various level of criminal seem...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...l needs to be punish and punish quickly so as to avoid the resentment that harness in th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
...mple as it looks. The jury can not have a a good view into every facets of one prob...
^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...mple as it looks. The jury can not have a a good view into every facets of one pr...
^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
...mple as it looks. The jury can not have a a good view into every facets of one prob...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, as for, as to, for example, i think, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75581395349 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70078008882 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584302325581 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7807866784 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261974182669 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707466756419 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610201691053 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14418243901 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573048669206 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.