In the recent coming year, adolescents idolize sports stars even though some perform bad examples. In my opinion, I still agree that it still generate a positive effect overall.
Sports idols create good impression on youngster in many ways. Firstly, being sporty which means people have to maintain a healthy lifestyle and making healthy choices every time on their daily diets. Secondly, young people draw inspirations from their idols, since some stars do charity work on public services, this greatly impact on the society in an upward development. They tend to replicate what their idols do and this is beneficial for the public. Finally, high competency often appears in sport games, especially team sports such as: football, volleyball, basketball, etc. This motivates team-play character, enhances team work ethic and they are good aspects when considering for jobs with future employer.
However, some minor influences on the society are still rising because of the adverse images traversed by several sport idols. The usage of drugs and adrenaline enhancement in world sports is widely recognised via the news and internet for the betterment of competitor's performance. For example, Lance Amstrong's scandals is on the news for some years and it greatly damages his image on his fans by the way he uses doping injection on purpose. Furthermore, by concentrating only on sports, other skills such as mental and cognitive abilities gradually decrease. This somehow affects people's scores in school curriculum and this do not seem valuable for later appraisals and recruitment. Finally, not everyone is good at sport so other stars in various fields should also be worldwide tributed.
In conclusion, youngsters follow their sport idols is a good thing and I think it is a positive development for the society overall.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, by the way, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33793103448 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7284034697 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651724137931 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0773816827 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271413486374 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802582378829 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548455822836 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153003946213 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464941751452 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.