Regarding the notion of fund-savings and the reasonable goverment incentives spreading, nowadays, there are more and more arguments relate to whether a significant investment in education is appropriate for some certain unregconisable fields. Personally, I feel that the opportunity should be equally divided between students, not depends on which major they are pursuing and I will explain why in this essay.
Firstly, as the world keeps changing continuosly, it is undecidable to conclude which fields are better for the society and students should incline to enroll a particular course more than others. For example, few years ago, banking and finance is being considered as a craze. To be able get a job in banking section is what every people is striving for because of the appraisals and perks are provided with it. However, we can have a look at the current situation when modern technology create various opportunities for global organisations to step up with the game. Futhermore, inequality is when goverment concentration adheres only to the one that needed can create a futher explosion in number of employees provision. Future generations tend to apply for that course only in their school curriculum which will lead to a redundancy in a particular human resource. Lastly, not every human share the same way of thinking nor the same talent, so such discrimination can deteriorate motivation or even counter-productive. Youngsters who are in different university courses may undergo the feeling of unworthiness and penalised that are harmful for their will and even create adverse influence for the whole society.
I regconise that some people may argue it is a waste to put so much money in something modern societies do not need. A good amount of fund definitely can boost the talent seeking procedure, improve research and development and so on. These are not something that should be hinderred and I believe this is a huge advantage for any organisation.
To concluded, my personal viewpoint is that there are many other benefits with the right funding. However, these advantages can not outweight the disadvantages since there are still jobs which specifically need someone who is good at it to implement and furthermore, who knows what will happen in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
... appraisals and perks are provided with the it. However, we can have a look at the cur...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, look, may, regarding, so, still, for example, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15027322404 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94523986716 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587431693989 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.167948698 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168599447651 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506216742295 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402831849092 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954641358844 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221909655642 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.