Nowadays, the ongoing crimes in both rural and urban area in many country worry both the citizen and the government. People have been arguing about whether criminal reports should be public on media. In this essay, I will look both sides of the argument and propose my opinion.
Let us start by looking at the benefits of the public announcement of crimes. First of all, not only the detailed information of the criminals but also the way they have carefully planned before committing crime are publicized. By this way, the crime reports broadcasted on the television alert people to stay out of trouble ahead. For example, since the locals know that there is an appearance of vandalism, murderers and rapist in the neighborhood, street cameras and police patrols are active with a greater frequency for the sake of safety. Moreover, the convicted delinquent after being released by police tend not to break the law again if he or she knows their personal information has been spread out widely. Hence, it would raise a sense of guilty inside and they would not likely to fall in to the dark side again.
On the other hand, the prominent of crime reports may exert negative impacts on the society. Petty crimes such as shoplifting and political criminals deserve a second chance as their actions are not considered to be damaging to the life of other people. If we punish them too hard, it will raise some kind of hatred and resentment in them during the reintegration into the society. Besides, these offenders may also have children who are still in school at a very young age. There is highly probable that these kids will be discriminated from other classmates, some of them might fail to build rapports with their peers or even drop out of schools early.
In conclusion, there are still controversial discussions on whether details of crimes should be hidden or not. Personally, I think the decisions made rely on the crime committed. Simply putting all types of criminals in the same cell is reckless, heartless and unfair to the people who are willing to become good again.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, still, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85434173669 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58335905507 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59943977591 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2222200981 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.941176471 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64705882353 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.9879759519 376% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172331556299 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550234446759 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595486924206 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106420801164 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352540727283 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.