It is becoming more and more difficult to escape the influence of media on our lives discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in media-rich society.
Nowadays, media has infiltrated our life in every sense by providing daily updates about politics, sports, or technology. Nevertheless, some traditionalists claim that these media coverage has the pernicious impact on people's lives. To my mind, positive promotions of media such as live match telecast and share market updates outweigh disadvantages.As we cannot stay isolated from this daily updates, the government and people - individually - can put a step forward in order to diminish negative consequences of media.
To begin with, media plays an indispensable role in people's lives by making them aware of daily updates of the business sector and about the breakthrough in the field of technology. By this, a person can enrich their knowledge about general affairs. Not just this, but it is being used, nowadays , as a tool of entertainment by telecasting live cricket matches or Olympics. Consider, for example, as per the research has borne out by the Indian child care and development, the Indian children are far more superior in GK (General Knowledge) with compared to other countries due to great media coverage in India. Seen in this light, for us and our future generation media do a good time, in every sense.
On the other hand, sometimes media hosts cannot identify the thin difference between media coverage and glamourizing it. Additionally, often, telecasted news about the robbery, mugging, and murders leads to devastating impact our children's impression about the media. As a result of these, children main frighten from an imaginary world - which is a product of media coverage, without being said. Seen in this light, up to extend it can prove as a grave danger to the community.
On a practical note, the government and people can work as a joint-venture to cater negative impacts of the media. I suggest government can introduce the strict rules on the broadcasting of news contain such as related to sex scandals, the vulgarity of violence. On other side, people can take initiative - by own - that what to watch and up to what extent. By this, they can mitigate negative influences of the media on families and future generations.
In a nutshell, the cited evidence supports my views that in spite of many possible backlashes of the media, as a part of today's modern world we have continuously keep in touch with media in order to stay updated with time. In the future, my aforementioned approach may strengthen all advantages of media by minimising negative results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...e market updates outweigh disadvantages.As we cannot stay isolated from this daily...
^^
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ily updates, the government and people - individually - can put a step forward in...
^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ust this, but it is being used, nowadays , as a tool of entertainment by telecasti...
^^
Line 9, column 163, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'kept'.
Suggestion: kept
...odays modern world we have continuously keep in touch with media in order to stay up...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'such as', 'as a result', 'in spite of', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.288172043011 0.247107183377 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.103225806452 0.155533422707 66% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0838709677419 0.0946595960268 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0322580645161 0.0501214627716 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0344086021505 0.0437548338989 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.154838709677 0.122226691241 127% => OK
Participles: 0.0344086021505 0.0403226058552 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.95222913139 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0279569892473 0.0326793684256 86% => OK
Particles: 0.00215053763441 0.00163938923432 131% => OK
Determiners: 0.101075268817 0.0861772015684 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0215053763441 0.021408717616 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00645161290323 0.011925033212 54% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2504.0 1933.35771543 130% => OK
No of words: 415.0 316.048096192 131% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03373493976 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20517956788 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344578313253 0.374742101984 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.265060240964 0.28420135186 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212048192771 0.203846283523 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132530120482 0.137316102897 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95222913139 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.037074148 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559036144578 0.56093040696 100% => OK
Word variations: 65.4572546214 60.7387585426 108% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0891783567 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0555555556 20.7743622355 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8900010742 49.517814964 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.111111111 127.492653851 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0555555556 20.7743622355 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.814263465372 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 49.5615796519 49.1944974215 101% => OK
Elegance: 2.81012658228 1.69124875643 166% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490975944603 0.332605444948 148% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0931345797165 0.102741220458 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0655653181208 0.0668466124924 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.540427371968 0.534860350844 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15617612014 0.148594505496 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186763995916 0.134430193775 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839722739277 0.0742795772207 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.365062966205 0.324371583561 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.065058549322 0.0638462369009 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326295551402 0.228012699653 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309003547066 0.058150111329 53% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.5751503006 233% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.