It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future? Do you think it brings positive or negative development?
In modern civilization, the issue of how a higher proportion of older generations influenced profoundly the national economy in every country has been a controversy in the long run as a foreseen circumstance. Although many people believe that those types of labor would generate some positive development, there involves negative alternative consequences that should be taken into account.
Initially, it is no exaggeration to say that there is a predictable figure of the proportion among older people turning to attain remarkable improvement in terms of gaining specialized knowledge. What can be clearly seen is that the older labor did obtain considerably and be trained from decades ago in which they are now expertise in a specific aspect such as economy. Thus, the more percentage of the older generation is, the more high-educated and specialized employees would be provided sufficiently for their own economy.
Notwithstanding, scientists along with other researchers claim that consequential likelihoods should not be underestimated as it literally impacts on some general spheres of a country in the next decades. First and foremost, considering the budget’s government must spend on taking care of those labor workforce, it is anticipated to be further expensive than in the past since the process of urbanization. Moreover, the government still has to utilize the amount of money in the national budget for insurance as well as retirement for those who are in the older class. As a result, it seems to not be profitable and preferable to maintain the number of older people in a nation, dominantly prioritizing the economic progress.
In conclusion, even though the promising advantage that the labor workforce in previous generations brought to one or even numerous countries in the future as being expected, other repercussions should not be ignored in some particular circumstances. However, whether they bring back the benefit for their country, we still appreciate the time and effort emerging into the economic development, education as well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45794392523 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24023781821 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591900311526 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.6414469009 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 159.272727273 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232457887679 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795391732938 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435271113107 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133427410565 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436021362093 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.