Internet access must be limited to students.
In modern civilization, the issue of how accessing the internet influences human’s lives has become a spark of controversies among the crowd. Some researchers dispute that internet access must be considered to restrict the reach of students. Notwithstanding, many adopt a viewpoint that the advantages of accessing the internet are outweighed its downsides in every sphere of education, entertainment as well as society.
Initially, accessing the internet is claimed to offer students videos or information with violated tendencies these days. On the contrary, despite the fact that the approaching to the internet causes considerably potential risks for students such as violated videos or even negative impacts on their mental health, it is argued that tons of information on the internet helps youngsters today expand their scope of knowledge from around the world. This could be explained by the fact that there are a multitude of websites that allow users to access the internet instantly and straightforwardly within the realm of education, entertainment, or policy without any geographical barriers. Therefore, this amenity would provide the younger generation a number of alternative choices implementing their reservoir of knowledge to prepare for the future path.
Besides, opponents debated that not only could internet access lead to mental effects, but it also makes students nowadays isolated and lonely. However, others believe that thanks to accessing the internet, youngsters turn out to increase lists of friends including people who are internal and external living in the country. More specifically, the advent of social applications, namely Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter accessing by the internet seems to be universal as almost all people are using on a regular basis. Playing games, chatting with each other, or even sharing practical experiences merely through computer screens is dominantly relative as a part of the entertainment. Thereby, it is assumed that internet access makes a great contribution to connecting people in the globe more convenient and easier than in the past as a breakthrough in technological advancements during centuries.
Moreover, scientific studies demonstrated that internet access results in the dependence on students which is a leading cause of changing the lifestyle. Nevertheless, it should be universally acknowledged that students are inspired thoroughly about those aspects of attaining a healthy and successful lifestyle from the internet. In a specific circumstance, what posted and performed on social media are accessible to students bring myriad positive effects to motivate them intensely in lieu of educating face-to-face in the school curriculum. Thus, at least in some cases, the benefits of accessing the internet should be taken into account.
All of this being said, the aftermaths of accessing the internet exist at manifold levels, yet it gives young generations amenity-oriented improvement in which is likely more eminent than its disadvantages. Thanks to the access of the internet, whether on social or psychological sides, the convenience of accessing via the internet would still be appreciated and students will persistently develop and gain further achievements in the long run.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, at least, such as, as well as, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 41.998997996 179% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2787.0 1615.20841683 173% => OK
No of words: 492.0 315.596192385 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66463414634 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20010562631 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 176.041082164 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 864.9 506.74238477 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2914476728 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.833333333 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480176191774 0.244688304435 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154141830665 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084815400187 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279736743335 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438153757498 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 78.4519038076 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.