It is undeniable that internet has penetrated into human life, be it education, community, employment. While certain people believe that the internet is a remarkable tool in terms of communication, others endorse that it might not be the optimal way for searching the information. From my perspective, I completely agree that the internet is an exceptional tool.
The internet plays an essential role to human in various aspects with respect of communication. In terms of education, by browsing the internet, abundant information on specific website are accessible for every student. A compelling example can be seen in the website called “Conversation”, articles of different fields including science, technology, education are available for students. Furthermore, the internet provides people with permission to share their perspective and opinion on certain issues or news. A case in point is that the people are entitled to share the information on the sharing platform of internet. In this case, people are capable of gaining the useful message on the internet.
On the other hand, some people consider that the internet might not be best place to search for information. This is often due to the fact that the internet is an area which inundated with deceptive and skeptical message. Several people upload the articles and video clips in order to accumulate their popularity rather than conveying knowledgeable message to the public. For illustration, the website called “Youtube” provides plenty of short clips uploaded by people throughout the world. The short clips concerning the health are usually of insufficient scientific evidence. Instead of conveying the virtually practical information to audience, people who share these groundless video aim to bolster their own popularity on the website.
By way of conclusion, as argued above, I utterly consent that the internet is a prominent tools for people to find information by virtue of its advantages. However, people should be capable of disguising between the real and fake message.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the best'.
Suggestion: be the best
...le consider that the internet might not be best place to search for information. This i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'tool'?
Suggestion: tool
...onsent that the internet is a prominent tools for people to find information by virtu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51724137931 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27598055912 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542319749216 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1011593103 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.529411765 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.17647058824 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220706494605 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731309800533 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551264051956 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136951847962 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225322348014 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.