There is little doubt that providing successful education of children is one of the objectives of every family. However, as concerning ways of learning, some people believe that children’s performance in their academic fields is more unsatisfied than before because of television. In my view, I utterly disagree with the prompt due to several reasons, which would be expressed in the ensuing paragraphs.
Firstly, television is an effective learning method because it offers a variety of programs with useful information. Exclusive of some channel contains violence and pornography which is not suitable for children, nearly all fields of programs are accessible on television. For instance, National Geography comprises considerable knowledge such as biography, medicine, technology and so forth. Furthermore, the latest news and information are broadcast in the international channel as well. As a result, I firmly consent that television is an essential tools for children to learn.
On the other hand, it is important for children to learn by the assistance of video image. As well as the narration of words, combining dynamic image while reading would substantially fortify the children’s memory for learning. To demonstrate, the children get visual input by the television whilst reading the subtitle. Recent research often indicated that visual input would strengthen the connection of neurons in human brain.
In conclusion, as argued above, I am convinced that television is an indispensable method for learning by virtue of its availability of information and serving as an effective learning assistance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6693877551 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22850692678 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616326530612 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1921009092 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182425729207 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638451427394 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041156782409 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102111809065 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025281056759 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.