It is a good thing for people in senior management positions to get higher salary than other workers in the same company. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that the company’s leaders deserve to have lucrative incomes than other employees. Considering all the aspects of the argument, I totally lean forward the idea as the importance of these members is much greater.
Undoubtedly, the key managers would have a clear-sighted vision for the company’s future which leads to success. This makes the company become unique and provides better opportunities to fight against the other opponents. It is not difficult to find out all the successful corporations around the world are guided with smart marketing strategies from the Board of Directors. For example, Facebook, a social network developed by Mark Zukenburg, has become the most favorite page due to understanding the demand to exchange information among its users.
Apart from this, the managerial positions also have to take a full responsibility for their workers regards to job security and safety. Anyone who is employed is desperate to have a secured job to stabilize the life. With the fast-paced life today, job hopping is likely to be considered as a risk, so it is the leaders’ duty to make sure and satisfy the workers. Besides, safety at work is also a priority which the corporation needs to take into account. A minor accident happened in the workplace can cause a bad image to the company’s reputation.
In conclusion, the senior managers in any workplace should be paid off with better incentives for their devotions and dedication for their jobs. Despite that, they should consider to keep up the equality among their employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sides, safety at work is also a priority which the corporation needs to take into...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, apart from, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2140077821 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03831508189 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642023346304 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3843026875 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.076923077 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0913679913532 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289683974232 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363995046276 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0536150277407 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140801300728 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.