It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In recent years, there has been growing demand to build park in societies. Some people say that constructing parks is a wastage of space while some say it's beneficial ifr many in today's world. Let us discuss about the same.

Firstly, building open area in society will help in increasing greenery ans fresh air to people. Open gym has become a motive for new government in Delhi to make people fit instead of their sedentary lifestyle. New generation have become lazy and avoid doing there household work. Earlier cleaning home and utensils was the habit of old people but domestic help do those work.

Secondly, the pressure of studies and competition have ruin the life of children and making there life busy. New generation lack physical activity like playing outdoor games but instead will play games on phone or on computers. They should be taught yoga for concentration in open air to increase concentration and learning power for studying.
On the other hand, building of parks have lot of cost attached to it which could be use in building better and improved infrastructure. Construction of houses could be the better option rather using forest land by cutting trees for building home resulting in livelihood to many.

I think, green areas is a must in today's world. Improving health of every individual by breathing fresh air and reducing obesity is a necessity. I strongly believe that in years to come, education campaign in terms of protection and benefit of public spaces would be campaigned.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, i think, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99604743083 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.662958229 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644268774704 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1366878992 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2666666667 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0815829466902 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245475691018 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247062495806 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0402918633585 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135420649019 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.