In a modern time, the situation has come where wastage of things are more than their usage. Earlier in past, things required were only bought at that time but now the trend and requirement have changed. Let us illustrate the causes for the same.
Personally I think waste produce is the reason of poor management of need. Things are purchased in advance in the sale season and are given or used when required. We can see this in winter closing season or summer packing, huge discounts are given by promoting the left over stock. For a birthday gift, the stuff is purchased in the sale and is offered on birthday after 3 months.
Secondly, government should take action on wastage done by industries. Some companies like exporters and the dyers, use chemicals and waste water. Something should be done to stop the water by imposing water treatment plan to recycle the water wastage. Evidence on this was provided by "The Hindustan Times" last year, the Tshirt while stitching has to go from 20 washes before stitching.
In my opinion, education should be provided in mall, school and college to people about the wastage and the treatment. Earlier, government imposed a bill to put recycling plant to every industry and after 1 year it banned dyeing resulting in failure of many companies in pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ings are more than their usage. Earlier in past, things required were only bought at th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91928251121 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55343268959 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.668161434978 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9578832052 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3846153846 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0712874152439 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0228388075329 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294219323383 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0368612796041 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209811161168 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.