Some people say that change is the father of innovation while some say it is a wastage of time and resources. It is a complete matter of discussion among all about the same. Let us discuss about both views and opinions in the following paragraph.
Firstly, learning new things give birth to new ideas and techniques which could benefit everyone like using emails. Earlier letter was sent via post office and took a week to reach the destination but now the technology has changed, email reaches the destination in a click of button without any charges. Attachment can also be attached with an email. Trend has changed, new generation clicks a photo and sends the person via WhatsApp to worldwide which has made world more closer to each other on a click of a button.
Secondly, machines and technology have made life much easier. Making a yarn was A difficult job earlier as 20-30 persons were required to make a cloth but now a single machine does the work for the same with an operator and the time has also reduced for manufacturing.
However, it has made people life complicated and lazy. More disease have got spread due to obesity and sedentary lifestyle. They feel better to pay bill as the office rather than online as there body remains fit and active. Earlier house wifes do the cleaning themselves at home and they feel no joint pain and problem as every body part was active.
In my opinion, both points have there negative as well as positive effects. Not everyone can afford to be digitalised as it is difficulty to learn it. If the payment get deducted by trying the first time it would be a loss for old people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 470, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...tsApp to worldwide which has made world more closer to each other on a click of a button. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...king a yarn was A difficult job earlier as 20-30 persons were required to make a c...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...problem as every body part was active. In my opinion, both points have there ne...
^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...pinion, both points have there negative as well as positive effects. Not everyone can affo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6275862069 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46464657885 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0797196253 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.875 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122787342731 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386389069798 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483825620269 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639802168764 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663373242307 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.