There is an opinion that children punishment is practical to teach the disparity between right and wrong to young age groups. I am not in favour of such a practice due to some detrimental effects on youngsters and instead; it is required for parents and school teachers to provide new ways of teaching methods about right actions to them.
It is apparent that imposing some physical punishment on the youth is considered harmful because many of them are suffering from physical and psychological pain or trauma in their whole lives. As physically fragile and feeble, the young could get several injures or bruised, which take time long to be cursed or recoverd themselves. Also, the relationship between parents and their children might become worse. This is because young people generally are hurt mentally by believing that they are not adequately respected and regarded to be a loved one by parents while being reckless corporal punishment.
However, there is more effective, and safety measures teachers and parents can conduct when their children make some mischief. One of the best steps will be carrying out voluntary activities for their community such as throwing away wastes into the bins in public locations. Unlike children punishments, by participating in such exercises with others or friends, young people can learn the way of making a better local area as well as often reflect their wrong-doing by themselves. Thus, the youth who is strongly influenced by such direct and the first-hand experiences is likely to understand and apprehend the difference between good and evil more easily not having conflicts with family members or teachers.
In conclusion, it seems not to be efficient for children to be being punished because of adverse effects. Therefore, providing alternative actions including doing voluntary works can give rise to more beneficial impacts not only on young children's behaviours but also our society.
- The group below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electircity 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult America in two of the years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where re 84
- Some students leave their parents when they go to university but some students live with parents, which do you think is a better practice? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2540192926 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77365066201 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617363344051 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.520065783 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.166666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181923284654 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668984457462 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052604609551 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10826767646 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356496107109 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.