The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information.
The given bar charts give information about different four jobs which graduate and postgraduate students did, except for full-time occupation in the UK, after they finished courses in 2008.
Overall, it can be seen that the general trend of vocational preferences performed by students who are graduates and postgraduates are similar. Doing further study was the most popular among both groups, while voluntary work consisted of the least number of students among them. However, the actual number of both groups categorised showed the significant differences.
As for the UK graduates, nearly 30,000 of students did further study, which was the largest figure and followed by about 17,740 of them who did work for part-time. Meanwhile, pupils who were not employed were not far behind with roughly 16,300 and those who did voluntary job comprised of only 3,500.
Similarly, the majority of postgraduates in the UK pursued further study with approximately 2,725 and which led to work for part-time with 2,535. On the other hand, pupils who were in unemployment and conducted voluntary work made up only 1625 and 345 people respectively. Interestingly, the real number of UK graduates who made various careers were ten times larger than that of postgraduates.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ional preferences performed by students who are graduates and postgraduates are similar...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, while, as for, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.335 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87739031068 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1453675995 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.555555556 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315180364525 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120307078485 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791781609423 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193117962296 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685972517356 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.