The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information.
The charts below illustrate the student number in uk who did not have a full time job after graduated university in 2008. It can be clearly seen from the table charts that destination of uk graduates and post graduates have the similar pattern.
According to the charts, the number of student who have university bachelor continue study in the higher level was 29,665 students, this figure was just over 10 time as high as the number in postgraduate students. In addition, there was just under 18,000 students had a part-time work after leaving college in 2008 more about 15,000 than the number in postgraduate students.
Meanwhile, the students who were jobless stood at approximately 16,000 students whereas the figure in postgraduate students were 1,625. Finally, the number of students became volunteers were 3500, 10 time as high as postgraduate students number who took part in voluntary work (350 students).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...student number in uk who did not have a full time job after graduated university in 2008....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... work after leaving college in 2008 more about 15,000 than the number in postgrad...
^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s number who took part in voluntary work 350 students.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1677852349 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73807408272 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5088171082 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33350059917 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184554035362 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124993913634 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228673608045 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885524688415 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.