The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different citid s between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different citid s between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.

The bar graph illustrates changes about prices of house in five particularly cities namely new york, madrid, tokyo, frankfurt, london from 1990 to 2002 and compared with the figured 1989. It can be seen from the graph that there was a sharp rose of house prices in london during this period of time.
Between 1990 and 1995 the prices of house declined slightly in london and tokyo approximately 7,5 percentage and 5 percentage in new york compared with the average house prices in 1989. In contrast, there were small increases prices in frankfurt and madrid just over 2 percentage.
In addition, from 1992 to 2002, london had a rapid surge in prices house, this figure is 10 percentage higher when compared with 1989. Beside that, new york, madrid, and frankfurt prices house had slight growth, while tokyo was the only one had prices of house 5 percentage lower than 1989.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e of house prices in london during this period of time. Between 1990 and 1995 the prices of h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n and tokyo approximately 7,5 percentage and 5 percentage in new york compared wi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39551432659 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1698260824 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394253243986 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208139747052 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117254485271 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294434148817 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519567999615 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.