it is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
Some people reckon that how important it is to teach our children the identification among right and wrong things which they are viable to face in their schooling time. I strongly agree to this viewpoint and would discuss further which suggested punishment will bring back positive returns for our offspring.
Education is listed as the priority of any development worldwide. In particularly, when kids live out of their home without monitoring from their parents will freely approach to negative behaviours, involved to robbery, meet up with bad guys and be guided to do unacceptable crimes. Moreover, too engrossed to playing will probably alleviate their concentration to studying, leading to consequences will disturb their future and down the road. Therefore, training for children to avoid any committing crimes they could do is responsibility of either their parents or teachers.
It is obvious that this training should be accompanied with punishments in order to enforce them to comply our stringent rules. Fear of being scold or crowded, even cut theỉr daily allowance or restrict them from watching TV could be considered as a consequences they must face when they perform a bad attitude. For instance, kid could be tempted by stealing toys or schooling stuffs from their friend house or worse, they dishonestly pocket money from their own family. Such kind of behaviours, children should be compulsory to earn money to compensate loss for their friend or commit to do house chores or taking care for family pets. By doing this, children not only learn a lesson but also develop responsibility even when they are just a little kid. Physical penalty would need to be eliminated to educating methods, in lieu of that, verbal explanation could be incentivize to delicately nurture their understanding.
Distinction lesson of right or wrong should be applicable for children with schooling programme coordinately. Realising the vital role of restriction to children as a must, either parents or teachers should corporate in directing our children avoid doing negative actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | eslamyousry | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | shihan99 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | kingdangyeu0606 | 22 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Mimibae 985 | 56 | view |
- Task 2: Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governmentsrather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishmentson driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 89
- Task 2: The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing.What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 84
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing.What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., too engrossed to playing will probably alleviate their concentration to studyin...
^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a consequence' or simply 'consequences'?
Suggestion: a consequence; consequences
...from watching TV could be considered as a consequences they must face when they perform a bad ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, honestly, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in particular, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32930513595 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92740670638 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592145015106 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4760626396 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172901105122 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697267909436 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561360613299 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117637472815 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387364718062 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.