It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In term of innovation in technology, scientists and tourists currently are able to travel to isolated natural areas such as South pole. While I accept that this development has some potential problems, I believe that its benefits are more significant.
On the one hand, travelling to remote natural regions has some drawbacks. Firstly, because landing in a new place, participants need to meet many requirements to be competent for the journey. In addition, those people have to finish training courses and have necessary knowledge to face with dangerous situations such as being attacked by wild animals or running out of food. Secondly, the cost of travelling to isolated areas is exorbitant. Therefore, just some people who have a lucrative income can afford it or a great part of public purse is allocated to scientific researches. However, this research may disturb the life of animals in these areas.
On the other hand, I believe that the drawbacks are outweighed by the positive impacts. Primarily, travelers are likely to have some fresh experiences and unforgettable memories when visiting uncommon areas such as South pole. Since, tourist attractions around the world has become too familiar, those people tend to look for remote natural environment in the holidays. Additionally, scientists have chances to obtain in-depth knowledge about natural habitats. By setting food in new lands, they may find some new species which have profound effects on the enhancement of science.
In conclusion, it is true that travelling to isolated natural areas has both positive and negative effects. However, I believe that its benefits are more significant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34351145038 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90586132983 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591603053435 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1027206474 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239166045969 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075597961899 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730493672179 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152415244646 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787939678483 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.