It is a fact that technology is developed. Thus, human can explore and travel to distant natural environment in recent days, such as South Pole or desserts. This trend would create certain benefits but there will also be some drawbacks.
It is clear that travelling remote nature would have advantage in economic field. This activity can create a huge source of profit in this kind of tourism. Since, expenses for transportation, protective gears and guides is prohibitive. Besides, there will be many filthy rich tourists who want to have an enjoyable experience and pay for this type of service. For example, NASA, a space company of America, has organized a trip to the moon. As a result, 12000 visitors had signed up to participate to this new plan. However, the price for this space travel costs an arm and a leg, about $35000 per night.
On the other hand, the development of travelling to distant nature causes many advantages to environment. The appearance of human discoveries will upset the ecosystem due to the remote biodiversities are following fixed rules, the emergence of a strange spiece like human will brake it and create consequence for the creature there. For instant, a human landing to South Pole will generate a great source of heat from fuel-powered ships. Therefore, the ice sheets will melt and lead to the lost of habitat for animals living here like penguins.
In summary, travelling to remote natural environment regarding to bring profits for economy. However, the downside would emerge consequently in term of upseting ecosystem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, however, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for example, in summary, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08139534884 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80136044366 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612403100775 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3971332752 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9375 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30154098794 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910758924735 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756857443874 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176525393126 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215356282239 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.