It is often said that government spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important.
Do you agree or disagree?
Environmental issues are often viewed as the most vital to solve in the 21st century. Experts throughout the developed and developing world claim that the governments contemporarily spend too many funds on protecting wild-living animals, owing to the fact that there is a myriad of more meaningful problems. Personally, I advocate their point of view. However, the protection of wildlife should be not abandoned.
Let us get it started with the paramount reason why the authorities ought to dedicate more money to other issues. In the modern, contemporary world, the city agglomerations all over the world struggle with air pollution. This problem is exceedingly critical because in conjunction with overpopulation it may be a detriment to the health of inhabitants. Furthermore, the second fundamental problem to solve is the global warming and climate changes. The statistics available on the internet depict that the temperature in winter is increasingly higher. That may have an impact on the life of the residents who live in the areas located near the sea. The melting glaciers contribute to the increasing amount of water in oceans, and it may be life-threatening for them.
However, caring about wildlife is meaningful as well. Nowadays, many species are endangered. The recent research conducted by Harvard University indicates that within 50 years the 10% of all the species will vanish. The government should defray an ecologist that will take care of the wildlife. Moreover, these days, we have increasingly more hunters in woods. It is believed that the authorities must constrain the amount of them due to saving wildlife. An immense amount of animals dies out because of these people.
To recapitulate, spending money on saving wildlife is crucial. Nevertheless, there are more indispensable environmental issues to solve. The problems connected to people’s health are the most relevant and the government should invest more funds in improving the quality of air in the cities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | zhao_kangg | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | souravsaini93160 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | DNTMdntm | 11 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | Anas Shaikh | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | DQDang | 89 | view |
- It is often said that government spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 78
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public To what extent do you agree 56
- Many people are using credit cards or loans to run up huge personal debts that they may be unable to repay It should therefore be made more difficult for individuals to borrow large amounts of money What are your opinions on this Give reasons for your ans 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...junction with overpopulation it may be a detriment to the health of inhabitants. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36825396825 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11013266117 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1419201833 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5238095238 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61904761905 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173595230899 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430364054075 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496294536768 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109724735904 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587205231884 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.27 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.