It is often said that that governments spend too much on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems
that are more important.
Do you agree or disagree?
People argue that spending on protection of wildlife should be reduced as there are other serious issues to spend on. In my opinion, protection of wildlife is essential but not at the cost of other social issues.
People in favour of spending on protection of wildlife believe that it is the responsibility of humans to protect the wildlife, otherwise it will cause extinction of certain animals which can have detrimental effects on our ecosystem. There are specific species which lie above or below of other species in the food cycle and if their food cycle is disturbed it would badly effect our ecosystem. For example, if a certain specie becomes extinct, it means no food for specie next in food chain. As a result, that specie too face the threat of extinction.
However, other issues such as poverty is far more pertinent to solve than protection of wildlife. Poverty is more serious issue as it threatens the survival of humankind. For that, it is important to spend more on humans including health and education which will have a positive effect on the society. For example, a person who is healthy both mentally and physically is not a burden on society and having proper set of skills enable him to a job, ultimately contributing to society. Similarly, a large number of people are out of school because of not being able to bear expenses. Spending in education sector by subsidising the tuition fees will increase the literacy rate of the society, therefore increasing the number of opportunities to earn money and reducing poverty.
To conclude, wild life is part of our world and its protection is of utmost importance but other more serious issues should be solved first.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... food cycle is disturbed it would badly effect our ecosystem. For example, if a certai...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to face'?
Suggestion: to face
...in food chain. As a result, that specie too face the threat of extinction. However, o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ely contributing to society. Similarly, a large number of people are out of school because of not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, similarly, so, therefore, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90940766551 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71077900083 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540069686411 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.221032691 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.384615385 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157777583934 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614571492252 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511177092656 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10377527165 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278457311148 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.