It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media. do you agree that it is the main reason for a growth in the rate of juvenile crime? What solutions can be offer to deal with this situation.
Many people believe that social media is the main reason of causing
the trend of juvenile delinquency. While I totally agree with this view,
the family also has to take the responsibility for this problem. The
following essay would attempt to outline some viable solutions.
To start with, it is undeniable that the internet’s contents have a big
influence on teenagers. For instance, brutal images in movies and
games can trigger children’s imitation. As a result, they always try to
copy the character’s violent actions and desire to be professional in
the cinematography. Moreover, family sides also contribute to this
negative trend. Once parents ignore their children and are unable to
meet their basic demands, children will grow up in an unfulfilled
condition. Consequently, they easily take part in illegal activities
such as stealing or becoming drugs addict.
However, various steps can be taken to solve this issue. Firstly, the
government should control contents that appear on social media or
television. All unsuitable videos need to be labeled parental
advisory and require advance confirmation whether the watchers
are of enough age or not. Secondly, parents play an important role,
they should monitor both time-consuming as well as subjects on the
internet. Less neglecting and more supporting are certainly
necessary during the teenage period. Hence, parents can
understand their kids and build a connection with them.
In conclusion, by limiting violent movies and providing guidance
during childhood, juvenile crime will no longer exist in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch as stealing or becoming drugs addict. However, various steps can be taken to s...
^^^
Line 19, column 41, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...they should monitor both time-consuming as well as subjects on the internet. Less neglect...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62857142857 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9265789994 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689795918367 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7147373552 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.9333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.38176352705 548% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204018192894 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546647699541 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468788012254 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.042892765063 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491807820719 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.