It is argued that violence is increasing because of tv programs which are based on violence, and it also become stumbling block in the way of social progress thus, it should reduce. I totally agree with this idea. The following paragraphs discuss my view points.
Firstly, if teenagers watch these kinds of programs, then they also try to act like them, and sometimes, they commit serious crimes owing to these programs like as robbery and theft. Apart from this, they learn new techniques to theft. For example, in many western movies, viliain roles have been done by famous acters, then youngsters, who watch these movies they will influence by them, and commit crimes in their real life. Moreover, if children watch huge violence on tv programs, then they will be diverted from their moral path because they show their attitude towards everything. Sometimes, they can break their relationship with their friends.
Furthermore, they learn new ideas to give injuries to their enimies, and sometimes they do something which directly lead detrimental impacts on their lives. Nowadays, numbers of movies and programs promote to weapons therefore, when they watch these types of films hence, they also want to buy them. Sometimes, they flight with their parents which also main reasons to spoil the relationship among them.
To sum up, it is lucid that from above mentioned information violence related TV programs give numerous problems in the way of children's progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
...hich are based on violence, and it also become stumbling block in the way of social pr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, apart from, as to, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18410041841 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47811802763 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610878661088 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.961047961 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10483397524 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509943724485 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509749696857 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08550639259 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555479155546 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.