It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead. To what extend do you agree or disagree
A highly controversial issue today relates to whether money ought to be paid out constructing contemporary buildings rather than obsolete buildings owing to costly repairing expenses. The goal of the essay is to examine both points of view and then give my own opinion.
From one point of view, erecting new buildings is creating new opportunities and amenities for locals for instance brand new schools, colleges, cafes, libraries and so on. By such kind of places, many children possess a chance to study conveniently as well as learn more and others may be free from dairy fatigue and stress by visiting cafes. So if the government subsidies means to erect new buildings, the state will experience such kind of merits.
From the other point of view, keeping antiquated buildings can be well-nigh the same with constructing modern buildings in terms of profit coming to the state. Ancient buildings are renowned for their rich history. To clarify as our ancestors may have lived in these buildings, they comprehend aged items such as ancient jewelries, weapons and so on. In the light of these things being preserved for many years, a lot of tourists among the different countries focus their attention on them and begin to come to these countries.
To sum up after achieving a balance over if minding ancient buildings and erecting modern buildings, it is considerably true that vantages come by contemporary buildings appear to be outweighed by merits of old buildings. For that reason providing the money is subsidized to obsolete building, we shall keep the chance to get to know more about our rich history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A highly controversial issue today relat...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of view and then give my own opinion. From one point of view, erecting new bu...
^^
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... own opinion. From one point of view, erecting new buildings is creating new o...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e will experience such kind of merits. From the other point of view, keeping a...
^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...merits. From the other point of view, keeping antiquated buildings can be well...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and begin to come to these countries. To sum up after achieving a balance over...
^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... buildings, it is considerably true that vantages come by contemporary buildings ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, then, well, for instance, kind of, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03731343284 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77646041879 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0786248647 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.727272727 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210605201262 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795553881638 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870460304502 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137266092089 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550893781082 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.